Russian Military Embraces ‘Network-Centric Warfare’ in Ukraine
https://sputnikglobe.com/20230726/russian-military-emerging-bigger-stronger-from-ukraine-conflict-1112158208.htmlRussian Navy Rising Greater, Stronger From Ukraine BattleRussian Navy Rising Greater, Stronger From Ukraine BattlePentagon chief Lloyd Austin’s hope of seeing the Russian army rising from the proxy conflict with NATO in Ukraine “weakened” has not materialized, with Russia ramping up munitions manufacturing and fielding new, extra complicated weapons techniques. What’s Russia’s secret? Sputnik spoke …
Russian Navy Rising Greater, Stronger From Ukraine Battle
Russian Navy Rising Greater, Stronger From Ukraine Battle
Pentagon chief Lloyd Austin’s hope of seeing the Russian army rising from the proxy conflict with NATO in Ukraine “weakened” has not materialized, with Russia ramping up munitions manufacturing and fielding new, extra complicated weapons techniques. What’s Russia’s secret? Sputnik spoke to veteran army observer and writer Andrei Martyanov to seek out out.
2023-07-26T15:00+0000
2023-07-26T15:00+0000
2023-07-26T15:00+0000
evaluation
denis manturov
vladimir putin
russia
ukraine
nato
pentagon
tor-m2
buk-m3
onyx missiles
/html/head/meta[@name=”og:title”]/@content material
/html/head/meta[@name=”og:description”]/@content material
Russian Minister of Business and Commerce Denis Manturov introduced this week that protection enterprises have already surpassed manufacturing figures for all of 2022 within the first half of this 12 months, and that in the case of munitions, output is on the right track to exceeding “the general manufacturing quantity” of 2022 on a month-to-month foundation.Additionally this week, KB Mashinostroyeniya, a Moscow region-based state protection, scientific and design enterprise which makes Iskander missile techniques, air-launched anti-tank weapons and different munitions, reported that it has ramped up the manufacturing of some munitions by as much as 250 % in comparison with 2022, and that the corporate is fulfilling the state protection order in full.NATO Cannot Outgun RussiaPresident Putin promised again in March that the US and its allies gained’t have the ability to outproduce Russia in Ukraine, mentioning that for each artillery shell or tank NATO builds and sends to Kiev, Russia will have the ability to produce three or extra.And Russia’s output hasn’t been restricted to legacy Chilly Warfare-era tools, both, with protection enterprises demonstrating over the 18 months that it’s able to growing (and in lots of circumstances fielding en masse) a variety of essentially new tools, from a brand new technology of kamikaze UAVs to superior anti-drone defenses, and good techniques that includes AI capabilities for drones and missiles.Moscow’s capability to face up to crushing Western sanctions and ramp up the manufacturing of a broad assortment of weapons flies within the face of daring predictions by senior US officers and media final 12 months claiming that Russia would quickly run out of chips for its missiles, that NATO’s superior tanks would have the ability to minimize via Russian defenses like a sizzling knife via butter, and that the nation merely couldn’t match the rich and technologically superior Western nations’ superior army applied sciences.Russia’s marketing campaign of precision missile strikes on Ukrainian infrastructure, and the stalling of Kiev’s counteroffensive, have confirmed in any other case, with even essentially the most vehemently anti-Russian Western legacy media now admitting that the counteroffensive has slowed down, prompting some US officers to hurry responsible Ukrainian commanders’ techniques, and to insist that their tools just isn’t the issue.Having blown over $95 billion on arms to Ukraine, Western nations have more and more began speaking about their incapacity to maintain offering Kiev with weapons and ammo on the identical tempo as they’ve thus far. Some European nations have calculated that their armies would have the ability to battle a full-scale conflict for as little as 24-48 hours after their sending weapons and ammo inventories to Kiev. Earlier this month, President Biden admitted to media that america was deploying cluster bombs to Ukraine as a result of it was operating low on standard 155 mm artillery ammunition. The admission sparked harsh criticism from former President Donald Trump, who blasted Biden for primarily revealing that the emperor has no garments.American ‘Mythology’ Meets Russian Actuality“These individuals from the assume tanks [predicting the weakening of the Russian MIC], most of them by no means served a day within the armed forces. And to cite Basic Robert Latiff, writer of the guide Future Warfare, ‘all the pieces that the American public and politicians learn about warfare is primarily from the leisure trade.’ I’m starting to assume that many American generals additionally know and study warfare from the leisure trade, from Hollywood. These individuals are completely unprepared and never geared up to function with mainly what quantities to operational values, and so they don’t even perceive what they’re taking a look at,” Martyanov harassed.Characterizing the sector of Russia research in Western nations as “mainly a wasteland” in the present day, Martyanov steered that they don’t have the power to understand realities on the bottom as a result of they take their major information from Kiev, which falsifies it, and from “pseudo-academic shysters” in US academia whose “solely activity is to rewrite after which reiterate what Russia is and what’s historical past, particularly of the twentieth century, is, and promote it to the general public and policymakers.”America’s Warfare File: The ‘White Elephant’ within the RoomCommenting on the regular stream of triumphalist reporting in Western media over the previous 12 months that the Russian army industrial complicated allegedly has been weakened in Ukraine, Martyanov mentioned this amounted principally to “bitter grapes…skilled anger and jealousy” on the a part of the US protection institution.“We can not ignore this white elephant or 800 pound gorilla within the room,” which is that “American generals misplaced each single conflict they fought. And if anyone wants a reminder of that, how about they take a look at how america was leaving Afghanistan? However the level is not only Afghanistan, Iraq and Vietnam, in fact, except for the ‘superb’ victory over Grenada.”“For the common American political scientist who grew up with their Wall Road kind economic system, that’s the one I believe they studied, they function with gross home product numbers that are offered by Wall Road and shysters from the financial faculties. They nonetheless can not even grasp the concept” that the US could possibly be weaker than its adversaries, Martyanov mentioned.“For instance, Russia produces as a lot metal as america. And it produces six occasions extra aluminum…And while you take a look at these elementary financial and army indices, how will you clarify it? [Meanwhile] they nonetheless imagine that they’re the primary economic system on the earth, whereas China really dwarfs america.”What are Russia’s ‘Community-Centric’ Warfare CapabilitiesWestern observers protecting the Ukrainian disaster have spilled a whole lot of digital ink discussing network-centric warfare, the resource-intensive army doctrine aimed toward translating armies’ informational benefit, gained via issues just like the efficient use of communications, laptop networking, superior sensors and different tech, right into a real-world battlefield benefit that ends in sooner pace of command, deployment and hearth, elevated survivability, improved consciousness and better lethality.Naturally, most have touted Ukraine’s NATO-provided network-centric capabilities, whereas characterizing Russia’s “bordering on non-existent.”The fact says in any other case, Martyanov mentioned, pointing, for starters, to Russia’s in depth use of a broad vary of ballistic, cruise and hypersonic weaponry to focus on Ukrainian forces and infrastructure at standoff ranges, and Russian air defenses’ capability to floor the nation’s air pressure to make sure close to complete air superiority.“Technologically, america can not even produce something akin to that,” the observer emphasised.That is an space the place Russia has had expertise for many years, he famous, pointing, for instance, to the networking capabilities of the MiG-31 interceptor, which might present steering for missiles launched by different plane flying in teams of as much as six plane.“What it provides you is that your consciousness of the atmosphere grows dramatically. And that is achieved based mostly on a number of elementary rules, together with what known as ‘information and sensor fusion’. When you possibly can receive and course of info, for instance, from infrared search and monitor to radar, to even some sort of different purely visible sources. And then you definitely put collectively this info, you ‘fuse’ it and you’ve got this a lot clearer image.” That, in flip, “means that you can additionally effectively redistribute or reassign targets.”How Lengthy Has Russia Had Drone and AI Capabilities?Within the area of drone warfare, the place Russia appeared to lag behind NATO capabilities at first of the Ukrainian proxy battle, Martyanov famous that Russia’s perceived shortcomings hid behind-the-scenes developments which have greater than confirmed their capabilities this 12 months.The identical applies in the case of so-called synthetic intelligence (AI) know-how, Martyanov mentioned, recalling that the Onyx P-800 supersonic anti-ship missile’s predecessor, the P-700 Granit, had mathematically subtle proto-AI computing capabilities going again to 1983, together with automated goal choice, evasion and coordination capabilities.“So these had been the primary missiles with what you’ll outline as synthetic mind. And when the submarine was launching them, they may launch as much as 24 in a single salvo, and they might talk with one another, all 24 of them, will do their goal distribution or obtain focusing on from every missiles, assigned the position of a distant radar management,” he mentioned.“And while you take a look at this, this was a terrifying weapon. And the Russians have had it for 40 years now; after which clearly the extra trendy Onyx P-800, which is used very actively in and round Ukraine. It was used additionally to large impact in Syria,” Martyanov famous.“However sure, it’s nothing new. And now we’ve Lancet-3s, which is the entire swarm know-how. They’ll talk, they’ll redirect targets. They’ll determine on their very own what to assault. So sure, radio-electronics superior fairly considerably for the reason that Nineteen Seventies and Nineteen Eighties,” the army analyst summed up.
russia, ukraine, network-centric warfare, weapons, battle, proxy conflict, know-how, army trade, capabilities, protection industrial base, army trade, army capabilities, u.s., nato, military-industrial complicated, onyx, mig-31, drone, anti-drone, drone warfare, kamikaze drone, onyx missile, lancet drone, lancet, nato vs russia, myths, white elephant, aritifical intelligence, ai, army synthetic intelligence
russia, ukraine, network-centric warfare, weapons, battle, proxy conflict, know-how, army trade, capabilities, protection industrial base, army trade, army capabilities, u.s., nato, military-industrial complicated, onyx, mig-31, drone, anti-drone, drone warfare, kamikaze drone, onyx missile, lancet drone, lancet, nato vs russia, myths, white elephant, aritifical intelligence, ai, army synthetic intelligence
Russian Minister of Business and Commerce Denis Manturov introduced this week that protection enterprises have already surpassed manufacturing figures for all of 2022 within the first half of this 12 months, and that in the case of munitions, output is on the right track to exceeding “the general manufacturing quantity” of 2022 on a month-to-month foundation.
Additionally this week, KB Mashinostroyeniya, a Moscow region-based state protection, scientific and design enterprise which makes Iskander missile techniques, air-launched anti-tank weapons and different munitions, reported that it has ramped up the manufacturing of some munitions by as much as 250 % in comparison with 2022, and that the corporate is fulfilling the state protection order in full.
NATO Cannot Outgun Russia
President Putin promised again in March that the US and its allies gained’t have the ability to outproduce Russia in Ukraine, mentioning that for each artillery shell or tank NATO builds and sends to Kiev, Russia will have the ability to produce three or extra.
And Russia’s output hasn’t been restricted to legacy Chilly Warfare-era tools, both, with protection enterprises demonstrating over the 18 months that it’s able to growing (and in lots of circumstances fielding en masse) a variety of essentially new tools, from a brand new technology of kamikaze UAVs to superior anti-drone defenses, and good techniques that includes AI capabilities for drones and missiles.
Moscow’s capability to face up to crushing Western sanctions and ramp up the manufacturing of a broad assortment of weapons flies within the face of daring predictions by senior US officers and media final 12 months claiming that Russia would quickly run out of chips for its missiles, that NATO’s superior tanks would have the ability to minimize via Russian defenses like a sizzling knife via butter, and that the nation merely couldn’t match the rich and technologically superior Western nations’ superior army applied sciences.
Russia’s marketing campaign of precision missile strikes on Ukrainian infrastructure, and the stalling of Kiev’s counteroffensive, have confirmed in any other case, with even essentially the most vehemently anti-Russian Western legacy media now admitting that the counteroffensive has slowed down, prompting some US officers to hurry responsible Ukrainian commanders’ techniques, and to insist that their tools just isn’t the issue.
Having blown over $95 billion on arms to Ukraine, Western nations have more and more began speaking about their incapacity to maintain offering Kiev with weapons and ammo on the identical tempo as they’ve thus far. Some European nations have calculated that their armies would have the ability to battle a full-scale conflict for as little as 24-48 hours after their sending weapons and ammo inventories to Kiev. Earlier this month, President Biden admitted to media that america was deploying cluster bombs to Ukraine as a result of it was operating low on standard 155 mm artillery ammunition. The admission sparked harsh criticism from former President Donald Trump, who blasted Biden for primarily revealing that the emperor has no garments.
American ‘Mythology’ Meets Russian Actuality
“Let me put it this fashion: Now we have witnessed, within the final 15 months, a ‘21+ mature audiences solely specific’ demolition of the American army mythology and American technological mythology,” Andrei Martyanov, a veteran Russian army analyst and best-selling writer, informed Sputnik’s New Guidelines podcast.
“These individuals from the assume tanks [predicting the weakening of the Russian MIC], most of them by no means served a day within the armed forces. And to cite Basic Robert Latiff, writer of the guide Future Warfare, ‘all the pieces that the American public and politicians learn about warfare is primarily from the leisure trade.’ I’m starting to assume that many American generals additionally know and study warfare from the leisure trade, from Hollywood. These individuals are completely unprepared and never geared up to function with mainly what quantities to operational values, and so they don’t even perceive what they’re taking a look at,” Martyanov harassed.
Characterizing the sector of Russia research in Western nations as “mainly a wasteland” in the present day, Martyanov steered that they don’t have the power to understand realities on the bottom as a result of they take their major information from Kiev, which falsifies it, and from “pseudo-academic shysters” in US academia whose “solely activity is to rewrite after which reiterate what Russia is and what’s historical past, particularly of the twentieth century, is, and promote it to the general public and policymakers.”
America’s Warfare File: The ‘White Elephant’ within the Room
Commenting on the regular stream of triumphalist reporting in Western media over the previous 12 months that the Russian army industrial complicated allegedly has been weakened in Ukraine, Martyanov mentioned this amounted principally to “bitter grapes…skilled anger and jealousy” on the a part of the US protection institution.
“We can not ignore this white elephant or 800 pound gorilla within the room,” which is that “American generals misplaced each single conflict they fought. And if anyone wants a reminder of that, how about they take a look at how america was leaving Afghanistan? However the level is not only Afghanistan, Iraq and Vietnam, in fact, except for the ‘superb’ victory over Grenada.”
How Taliban Stormed Throughout Afghanistan, Smashing NATO-Educated Military in Ten Days
15 August 2022, 05:00 GMT
“The purpose is, simply to present you a technological instance…that america by way of air defenses…just isn’t even in the identical league with Russia. When it comes to cruise missiles, once more, america lags right here not by years, it lags by generations. And the identical goes for armor, the identical goes for operational ideas and issues of this nature, and even in digital warfare,” the observer harassed.
“For the common American political scientist who grew up with their Wall Road kind economic system, that’s the one I believe they studied, they function with gross home product numbers that are offered by Wall Road and shysters from the financial faculties. They nonetheless can not even grasp the concept” that the US could possibly be weaker than its adversaries, Martyanov mentioned.
“For instance, Russia produces as a lot metal as america. And it produces six occasions extra aluminum…And while you take a look at these elementary financial and army indices, how will you clarify it? [Meanwhile] they nonetheless imagine that they’re the primary economic system on the earth, whereas China really dwarfs america.”
Will the US Greenback be Changed by the Yuan?
What are Russia’s ‘Community-Centric’ Warfare Capabilities
Western observers protecting the Ukrainian disaster have spilled a whole lot of digital ink discussing network-centric warfare, the resource-intensive army doctrine aimed toward translating armies’ informational benefit, gained via issues just like the efficient use of communications, laptop networking, superior sensors and different tech, right into a real-world battlefield benefit that ends in sooner pace of command, deployment and hearth, elevated survivability, improved consciousness and better lethality.
Naturally, most have touted Ukraine’s NATO-provided network-centric capabilities, whereas characterizing Russia’s “bordering on non-existent.”
The fact says in any other case, Martyanov mentioned, pointing, for starters, to Russia’s in depth use of a broad vary of ballistic, cruise and hypersonic weaponry to focus on Ukrainian forces and infrastructure at standoff ranges, and Russian air defenses’ capability to floor the nation’s air pressure to make sure close to complete air superiority.
“The Russian air protection techniques have been within the net-centric paradigm a very long time now – since Soviet occasions, really,” the army skilled mentioned, pointing, for instance, to the ultra-long vary R-37 missile, which has confirmed kills at ranges past 200 km. The identical is the case with ground-based anti-air defenses, which have seen “simply [an] absolute dramatic enchancment” in efficiency on the fast battlefield, Martyanov famous, citing “the Pantsir-S1…the Tor-M2 and the Buk-M3 and issues of this nature.”
“Technologically, america can not even produce something akin to that,” the observer emphasised.
“Web-centric warfare and all the pieces related to it’s designed to resolve uncertainties in focusing on and detection of targets. Typically talking, to place it into easy phrases, it’s when every shooter communicates with every shooter within the acceptable theater or within the acceptable atmosphere,” Martyanov mentioned.
That is an space the place Russia has had expertise for many years, he famous, pointing, for instance, to the networking capabilities of the MiG-31 interceptor, which might present steering for missiles launched by different plane flying in teams of as much as six plane.
“What it provides you is that your consciousness of the atmosphere grows dramatically. And that is achieved based mostly on a number of elementary rules, together with what known as ‘information and sensor fusion’. When you possibly can receive and course of info, for instance, from infrared search and monitor to radar, to even some sort of different purely visible sources. And then you definitely put collectively this info, you ‘fuse’ it and you’ve got this a lot clearer image.” That, in flip, “means that you can additionally effectively redistribute or reassign targets.”
Russian MiG-31 Jet Chases British Spy Airplane Out After it Violates Airspace: Russian MoD
15 August 2022, 18:14 GMT
How Lengthy Has Russia Had Drone and AI Capabilities?
Within the area of drone warfare, the place Russia appeared to lag behind NATO capabilities at first of the Ukrainian proxy battle, Martyanov famous that Russia’s perceived shortcomings hid behind-the-scenes developments which have greater than confirmed their capabilities this 12 months.
“The purpose is, even already on the finish of the 2000s and the beginning of the 2010s, Russia was actively within the improvement of drone know-how. So it’s not prefer it got here out and instantly ‘oh my gosh, you see we’ve the drones and the Russians simply type of leapfrogged in to some sort of new paradigm.’ It was at all times there. Don’t overlook, a few of the first drones ever had been the [Soviet Tupolev Tu-143] Reys drones. Clearly, they had been nothing like the trendy ones, however the Soviet military was utilizing them extensively already within the Nineteen Seventies. So it’s not prefer it’s one thing new. What’s new, in fact, and particularly with the Lancet-3…is the truth that they use swarms now.”
The identical applies in the case of so-called synthetic intelligence (AI) know-how, Martyanov mentioned, recalling that the Onyx P-800 supersonic anti-ship missile’s predecessor, the P-700 Granit, had mathematically subtle proto-AI computing capabilities going again to 1983, together with automated goal choice, evasion and coordination capabilities.
Onyx: Traits of Russia’s Unstoppable Missile
“So these had been the primary missiles with what you’ll outline as synthetic mind. And when the submarine was launching them, they may launch as much as 24 in a single salvo, and they might talk with one another, all 24 of them, will do their goal distribution or obtain focusing on from every missiles, assigned the position of a distant radar management,” he mentioned.
“And while you take a look at this, this was a terrifying weapon. And the Russians have had it for 40 years now; after which clearly the extra trendy Onyx P-800, which is used very actively in and round Ukraine. It was used additionally to large impact in Syria,” Martyanov famous.
“However sure, it’s nothing new. And now we’ve Lancet-3s, which is the entire swarm know-how. They’ll talk, they’ll redirect targets. They’ll determine on their very own what to assault. So sure, radio-electronics superior fairly considerably for the reason that Nineteen Seventies and Nineteen Eighties,” the army analyst summed up.
What’s the Lancet Kamikaze Drone and What Makes It So Lethal?
