A second, high-ranking Los Angeles County sheriff's official claims Sheriff Alex Villanueva knew a few controversial use-of-force video 5 days after it occurred as a result of she confirmed it to him herself – and she or he says she was demoted over it in retaliation.Till only a few weeks in the past, Robin Limon …
A second, high-ranking Los Angeles County sheriff’s official claims Sheriff Alex Villanueva knew a few controversial use-of-force video 5 days after it occurred as a result of she confirmed it to him herself – and she or he says she was demoted over it in retaliation.
Till only a few weeks in the past, Robin Limon was an assistant sheriff, a part of the command workers slightly below Villanueva himself. She filed a declare Thursday, accusing him of attempting to border her and retaliating in opposition to her by forcing her to decide on between retiring or being demoted 4 ranks.
The declare was filed over an incident that occurred greater than a 12 months in the past, however got here to gentle simply final month, wherein an inmate punched a deputy, who then put his knee on the inmate for greater than three minutes, the Los Angeles Instances reported. Villanueva claims he did not know concerning the incident till months later in October, then modified his timeline to say he came upon about it in November.
Limon’s lawsuit claims Villanueva knew virtually instantly, as a result of she is the one who introduced him the video and watched it with him.
“Villanueva blocked a legal investigation into the matter, lied concerning the incident and claims he didn’t watch the video till November 2021 to suit a faux timeline,” the lawsuit alleged. She is now accusing Villanueva of obstructing justice and coated up the incident, then retaliating in opposition to her and others for blowing the whistle on unlawful conduct, in response to the lawsuit.
Limon’s lawyer, Vincent Miller, calls her account “a smoking gun.”
“This can be a individual with first-hand information who really walked the tape in to him, and confirmed it to him, and watched it with him,” Miller mentioned. “It destroys his faux timeline and story that he had seen it in October or November or no matter different date he may change it to now.”
That is the second whistleblower to come back ahead this week to say that they had direct information of Villanueva masking up the video and retaliating in opposition to those that uncovered it.
Villanueva has referred to as the primary lawsuit false, and has since launched a controversial investigation into the Los Angeles Instances reporter who broke the story, drawing nationwide consideration and scrutiny earlier than he backed off.
CBS2/KCAL 9 has reached out to Villanueva for his response to the most recent lawsuit.
Keep in touch with our news & offers
